Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Médecine du Sommeil ; 19(1):23-24, 2022.
Article in English | ScienceDirect | ID: covidwho-1708732

ABSTRACT

Objectif Devant l’engouement progressif suscité par les communications et formations sur le SAS auprès des médecins spécialistes mais aussi la promulgation de l’arrêté de création d’un certificat de sur spécialisation en sciences médicales en 2011/2012, le certificat troubles respiratoires au cours du sommeil a été créé en janvier 2019 par arrêté du ministère de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche scientifique. L’objectif était de former annuellement une vingtaine de spécialistes répartis à travers le territoire national par la faculté de médecine d’Alger et exerçant en milieu hospitalier ou libéral. Méthodes La première promotion a vu le jour en 2019 et est composée de 18 médecins spécialistes (pneumologues, ORL, endocrinologues, pédiatres et cardiologues) provenant de différentes régions de l’Algérie. Résultats Le programme du certificat comporte 4 séminaires de 2 jours répartis sur l’année 2019/2020 avec un stage pratique de 2 semaines au sein des différentes unités de sommeil. Ce programme pourra être modifié chaque année en fonction des résultats de l’évaluation finale. La pandémie liée au virus SARS-CoV-2 a perturbé le déroulement du certificat aussi bien pour les conférences, que pour le stage pratique, et l’examen final. Après une année de pause, et compte tenu des mesures préventives toujours en vigueur, le stage pratique a été réduit de moitié et l’examen final a pu avoir lieu le 1er juillet 2021. Conclusion La satisfaction des premiers lauréats est encourageante. La formation doit se poursuivre et une coopération de l’AAPSV avec la Société française de recherche en médecine du sommeil SFRMS est souhaitée.

2.
J Leukoc Biol ; 111(1): 269-281, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1591653

ABSTRACT

The immune system plays a crucial role in the response against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 with significant differences among patients. The study investigated the relationships between lymphocyte subsets, cytokines, and disease outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The measurements of peripheral blood lymphocytes subsets and cytokine levels were performed by flow cytometry for 57 COVID-19 patients. Patients were categorized into two groups according to the severity of the disease (nonsevere vs. severe). Total lymphocytes, T cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, B cells, and natural killer cells were decreased in COVID-19 patients and statistical differences were found among different severity of illness and survival states (P ˂ 0.01). The levels of IL-6 and IL-10 were significantly higher in severe and death groups and negatively correlated with lymphocyte subsets counts. The percentages of Th17 in the peripheral blood of patients were higher than those of healthy controls whereas the percentages of Th2 were lower. For the severe cases, the area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of IL-6 was the largest among all the immune parameters (0.964; 95% confidence interval: 0.927-1.000, P < 0.0001). In addition, the preoperative IL-6 concentration of 77.38 pg/ml was the optimal cutoff value (sensitivity: 84.6%, specificity: 100%). Using multivariate logistic regression analysis and ROC curves, IL-6 > 106.44 pg/ml and CD8+ T cell counts <150 cells/µl were found to be associated with mortality. Measuring the immune parameters and defining a risk threshold can segregate patients who develop a severe disease from those with a mild pathology. The identification of these parameters may help clinicians to predict the outcome of the patients with high risk of unfavorable progress of the disease.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/mortality , Interleukin-6/blood , Severity of Illness Index , Africa, Northern , Aged , Biomarkers/blood , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , COVID-19/immunology , Cytokines/metabolism , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Lymphocyte Count , Lymphocyte Subsets/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Prognosis , Treatment Outcome
3.
Cytokine ; 141: 155428, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1064991

ABSTRACT

Accumulating evidence supports that the viral-induced hyper-inflammatory immune response plays a central role in COVID-19 pathogenesis. It might be involved in the progression to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), multi-organ failure leading to death. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the immune-inflammatory biomarkers in COVID-19, then determine optimal thresholds for assessing severe and fatal forms of this disease.153 patients with confirmed COVID-19 were included in this study, and classified into non-severe and severe groups. Plasmatic levels of interleukin 6 (IL6), C-reactive protein (CRP), soluble-IL2 receptor (IL2Rα), procalcitonin (PCT) and ferritin were measured using chemiluminescence assay. Complete blood count was performed by Convergys 3X® hematology analyzer. Our results demonstrated that the peripheral blood levels of IL6, PCT, CRP, ferritin, IL2Rα, white blood cell count (WBC), neutrophil count (NEU), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (d-NLR) were significantly higher in severe forms of COVID-19. The ROC curve analysis showed that IL6 was the most accurate inflammatory biomarker. The calculated cutoff of IL6 (42 pg/ml) could correctly classify > 90% of patients regarding their risk of severity (area under ROC curve (AUROC) = 0.972) and the threshold value of 83 pg/ml was highly predictive of the progression to death (AUROC = 0.94, OR = 184) after a median of 3 days. Besides, IL-6 was positively correlated with other inflammatory markers and the kinetic analysis highlighted its value for monitoring COVID-19 patients. PCT and NLR had also a high prognostic relevance to assess severe forms of COVID-19 with corresponding AUROC of 0.856, 0.831 respectively. Furthermore the cut-off values of PCT (0.16 ng/ml) and NLR (7.4) allowed to predict mortality with high accuracy (se = 96.3%, sp = 70.5%,OR = 61.2)' (se = 75%, sp = 84%, OR = 14.6).The levels of these parameters were not influenced by corticosteroid treatment, which make them potential prognostic markers when patients are already undergoing steroid therapy.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/immunology , Interleukin-6/blood , Pandemics , Procalcitonin/blood , SARS-CoV-2 , Adolescent , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Algeria/epidemiology , Biomarkers/blood , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/mortality , Female , Ferritins/blood , Humans , Inflammation Mediators/blood , Interleukin-2 Receptor alpha Subunit/blood , Lymphocyte Count , Male , Middle Aged , Neutrophils/immunology , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Young Adult , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL